The government hasn’t “settled a position” on placing a climate trigger in fast-tracked environmental protection legislation, says Environment Minister Murray Watt, pointing to a review of the nation’s laws that did not recommend such a mechanism.
“What [reviewer Graeme Samuel] recommended was that companies, when they’re putting forward projects for approval, should disclose their emissions and should disclose what their plans are to reduce their emissions going forward,” Watt told ABC TV this morning.
Environment Minister Murray Watt.Credit: Sitthixay Ditthavong
“The reason Graeme recommended that was that we, of course, have a range of other legislation and measures in place to require companies to reduce the emissions of their projects.”
There are currently nine factors within the nation’s environmental protection legislation that can trigger review of a project by the minister, however the impact of a project on climate change is not one of them.
Many conservationists have called for the addition of a tenth “climate trigger” to slow or halt the approval of projects that would produce high emissions.
“We’ve got our net zero targets. We’ve got the safeguard mechanism, which requires the largest emitting projects in Australia to reduce their greenhouse emissions by five per cent every year and be net zero by 2050, so it’s not as if we’re not dealing with these issues,” Watt said.